Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Nicholas Solter<Nicholas.Solter at sun.com> > wrote: >> Piotr Jasiukajtis wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Colorado Main Requirements >>> >>> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/colorado/Requirements/ColoradoReqSpec.pdf >>> says that Colorado in phase 2 will eliminate the requirement for >>> shared storage by use Marcelo's ohac-avs project. Now in phase 1 we >>> can use iSCSI to provide similar goal so will ohac-avs be integrated >>> in phase 2? >>> >> Piotr, >> >> Good question ;-) >> >> Let me turn it around and ask you (and others on this list) whether you >> would find AVS support useful? What other "hardware minimization" features >> would you like to see in OHAC? > I think ohac-avs will be useful to provide a non shared solution for > VxFS and others in phase 3. > What other minimization features? > - iSCSI/FCoE instead of SAN > - non shared replication in >3 node clusters > - Geo AVS replication between clusters without shared storage > - I think running Colorado nodes as PVM XEN domains would be > interesting (at least for testing/developing) >
Piotr, Thanks for the feedback! Anyone else who has opinions on this topic, please email the list or feel free to email me privately. Thanks, Nick
