Sergei, This seems to be exactly the same question as is being asked on the cluster forum. (http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5393278). I guess my colleague might be back from vacation this week so he might get to reply directly. Otherwise, the best option is to log a support call.
Regards, Tim --- On 07/06/09 03:49, Sergei Kolodka wrote: > Guys, > > I've got question about HORCM behaviour on SC, or any cluster... > > If P-VOL host is down and S-VOL HORCM instance is running should > horctakeover be able to actually take control over array or all it > can/should do is to put S-VOL into SSUS Writable state and let admin > to do pairresync manually after that ? > > The problem we encountered is - if we do fallback to first node > without doing manually pairresync while we're on second node first > cluster screws itself up and can not start anything before we split > pair. Is this behaviour expected and is it should be exactly that way > ? > > We're running SC3.2 non-geo with TrueCopy replication. > > Thanks in advance. -- Tim Read Staff Engineer Solaris Availability Engineering Sun Microsystems Ltd Springfield Linlithgow EH49 7LR Phone: +44 (0)1506 672 684 Mobile: +44 (0)7802 212 137 Twitter: @timread ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~