Hi Thorsten, Looks good to me.
Thanks Jonathan Thorsten Frueauf wrote: > Hi, > > after Lucias changes and some testing a bit more the following changes > got necessary: > > - in order to identify the build version, it is not enough to strip off > "snv_" but also the appended letter in case of a respin for that build > > - within the substitution for the OS package branch version some packages > depend on, I forgot to prefix a 0. to the build number. > > - for some reason my script to determine dependencies did eliminate a > "p" from > the package name, that formed e.g. SUNWpool to SUNWool, which does not > exist. > Same for SUNWperl -> SUNWerl. > > - for the SUNWscmasau package the auto determination defined a > dependency on > itself - I though my script prevents that, but obviously that slipped > through > > - to accomodate Lucias changes to switch to jdk6 and open-jdmk, include > SUNWscmasar and SUNWscmasau in the list of packages to deliver and add > them > to ha-cluster-framework-cmass > > - SUNWscr did list twice the dir action for "etc/cluster/original" - the > pkg > command fails with a spectacular python stacktrace if that happens :) > > Please have a look at > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~frueauf/colorado-gate-ipsdefs-fixup/ > > Greets > Thorsten > > Thorsten Frueauf wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> some time ago I send a webrev with a 1:1 conversion of SVR4 prototype >> and pkginfo files into the IPS manifest world, along the design we >> defined at http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/ColoradoIPSBuild >> >> I did now refresh that webrev in order to contain some Makefile logic >> to "build" the ipsdefs hierarchy and actually perform the pkgsend to a >> configurable IPS repository URL. >> >> The changes also provide a start to consider package dependencies, >> legacy and license actions. There is logic to deal with pkg versions, >> also in the case for debug builds and developer only builds. I did >> also introduce some group packages, similar to the "package cluster" >> definitions we have within pkgdefs. >> >> I know this is a huge pile of files, but I would like to putback into >> the colorado staging gate next week (say Tuesday COB MET), if there >> are no major objections. There is follow-up work which is dependent on >> this putback, like dealing with the various SVR4 package script and >> refactoring the package content into a different structure (like we >> can now comine the root and usr packages for sure). >> >> Of course this is not yet set in stone and has further ToDo items, >> some of them I capture within the usr/src/ipsdefs/Makefile file as >> comments. >> >> Please review: >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~frueauf/colorado-svr4-to-ips-autoconversion/ >> >> Greets >> Thorsten > >
