Hi Tim Thanks very much your nice response. Looks I make the mistake.My HBA card is broken,I changed the HBA card, everything is fine.But the QFS performance in cluster in not equal to without cluster,there is a little performance degradation,but I think it is OK for me.
I have gotten serval times help from you.Your suggestion is great helpful to me. I always can learn somethings. Thanks! Regards, Lifeng Tim Read - Staff Engineer Solaris Availability Engineering ??: > Yang, > > This was cross-posted/forwarded and I replied that we need more > information on the tests. We they identical in *all* aspects except > for the introduction of Solaris Cluster? > > Thanks, > > Tim > --- > > > On 12/10/08 02:36, lf yang wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> I have two servers and one FC disk array .I install the >> Solaris Express nv97,the last version SAM/QFS and Sun cluster express >> 9/08. >> Now I find a problem :if the QFS runs in sun cluster environment, >> the performance is very poor.As my iozone test result, it only is >> about 10-30M Byte.But without the sun cluster ,the performance is >> good to accepet. >> Is the problem of Cluster or QFS filesystem? >> Is there any reasonable explain for this ?Any suggestion is welcome! >> >> Thanks! >
