Hi ,
Thanks for your details response.
Do you have an estimate on official statement/release?
Can you elaborate about this module functionality? Why is it enabled on all
interfaces by default?

Also, what other differences (kernel module/stack wise)  in Cluster mode vs
Non Cluster mode(boot -x).

Best Regards,
- Jacob


On 11/1/07, Ashutosh Tripathi <Ashutosh.Tripathi at sun.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Leon,
>
> Thanks for getting back to us on this.
>
> We are still analyzing the issue and are not sure yet if the
> problem is with the clhbsndr module, its interactions with
> the Solaris STREAMS framework, or something else entirely.
>
> While we are working on an official statement on this. I would
> suggest the following unofficial approach in the meantime.
>
>         Go ahead and run without the clhbsndr module on the
> cluster public interface, but beware that in case you log a
> support call on this cluster, particularly if it is related
> to cluster membership and heartbeats, the cluster support
> personnel may request you to reproduce the issue without
> this interim fix.
>
> Hope that answers your questions,
>
> Best Regards,
> -ashu
>
>
> Leon Koll wrote:
> > Hi Ashu,
> >
> > I am working with Jacob on this problem.
> > The command you've sent fixed the problem.
> > Q1: Is it safe to remove the clhbsndr module from cluster public
> interfaces ?
> > Q2: Is it a know bug?
> >
> > Thanks a lot,
> > -- Leon
> >
> > On 11/1/07, Ashutosh Tripathi <Ashutosh.Tripathi at sun.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Jacob,
> >>
> >> Additionally,
> >>
> >> Can you remove the clhbsndr module from the e1000g adapter:
> >>
> >> eg: ifconfig e1000g0 modremove clhbsndr at 2
> >>
> >> and report back what you find?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -ashu
> >>
> >>
> >> LaoTsao(Dr. Tsao) wrote:
> >>> hi
> >>> May be this is releated to the IPMP that is required by Sun cluster
> >>> When U run iperf -s server-IP  did U use the Logicalhost IP address of
> >>> the server?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jacob wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi List,
> >>>> I've heard many good things about this list and the opensolaris
> community,I sure hope someone here can help me out here.
> >>>>
> >>>> One of our systems is suffering for a very poor network throughput,
> which appears to be affected by Sun Cluster.
> >>>>
> >>>> The system consists of 3 T2000 machines in Sun Cluster(3.2) running
> on Solaris 10 u4.
> >>>> The network throughput in non cluster mode is about 800mbit on a
> single e1000g interface.
> >>>> The Network [b]throughput falls by about 50%[/b] when booting the
> machine(s) in cluster mode.
> >>>> To isolate possible LAN problems, I've connected two machines using
> cross cable - same result.
> >>>>
> >>>> The problem was reproduced by installing a brand new T2000 machine
> with similar configuration as a single node cluster.
> >>>>
> >>>> All throughput measurements were done using iperf.
> >>>>
> >>>> Have anyone encountered something similar?
> >>>> Does anyone have experience with T2000 machines in Sun Cluster with
> regard to Network performance?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks in advance,
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
> >>>> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
> >> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss
> >>
>



-- 
Not gonna be king of the world if you're slave to the grind
- Skid Row
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ha-clusters-discuss/attachments/20071101/55db17d8/attachment.html>

Reply via email to