Hi Matthew,

About:
 > However, once the monitor ran it re-shared I guess and now the ZFS 
based filesystems are not available.

That shouldn't happen. I suppose you are talking about the HA-NFS
monitor, right?

Can you send us the following data:

        - output of: clrs status
        - df -kl, BEFORE and AFTER the monitor ran
        - output of share command, BEFORE and AFTER the monitor ran

That should provide a clue as to what is going on on the system.

-ashu


Matthew C Aycock wrote:
> We are currently running sun cluster 3.2 on solaris 10u3. We are using 
> ufs/vxvm 4.1 as our shared file systems. However, I would like to migrate to 
> HA-NFS on ZFS. Since there is no conversion process from UFS to ZFS other 
> than copy, I would like to migrate on my own time. To do this I am planning 
> to add a new zpool HAStoragePlus resource to my existing HA-NFS resource 
> group. This way I can migrate data from my existing UFS to ZFS on my own time 
> and the clients will not know the difference.
> 
> I made sure that the zpool was available on both nodes of the cluster. I then 
> created a new HAStoragePlus resource for the zpool. I updated my NFS resource 
> to depend on both HAStoragePlus resources. I added the two test file systems 
> to the current dfstab.nfs-rs file.
> I manually ran the shares and I was able to mount the new zfs file system. 
> However, once the monitor ran it re-shared I guess and now the ZFS based 
> filesystems are not available.
> 
> I read that you are not to add the ZFS based file systems to the 
> FileSystemMountPoints property. Any ideas?
> --
> 
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ha-clusters-discuss mailing list
> ha-clusters-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-clusters-discuss

Reply via email to