I am +1 for pulling this in house, and I am +1 for having a more in depth discussion of whether or not we should be using it long term.
chris On Aug 27, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Caius Durling wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Christian Mohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> For the record, I don't really think the discussion here is regarding >> personal likes/dislikes of Blueprint. The discussion is regarding >> the recent >> changes in the Blueprint development infrastructure and how we >> should handle >> it. All I'm saying is that if we use Blueprint, by all means >> include it. If >> we don't, well, then don't. It's pretty simple. > > I think this is the important thing to note here. We *do* use > blueprint at the minute, its future is uncertain in terms of their > subversion repository staying stable and available to us. > > Here we're voting on whether to include the blueprint source > statically within our svn repo or not, the issue of whether to > use/include blueprint is for another day =) > > C > -- > Caius Durling > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +44 (0) 7960 268 100 > http://caius.name/ > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
