On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:21:12PM +0100, Andrew Rickmann wrote: > > There seems to be quite some interest in replacing the logo. While all > the alternatives presented have been good, if there is a consensus > that the logo needs to be changed perhaps a more structured approach > would be beneficial; i.e. what is it, explicitly, that the logo needs > to convey?
While I agree that a structured approach to logo development is probably a good thing, I don't think there is consensus that the logo needs to be changed (at least changed now). -- Michael C. Harris, School of CS&IT, RMIT University http://twofishcreative.com/michael/blog IRC: michaeltwofish #habari --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
