Is there some reason why we shouldn't be keeping this info in the postinfo table? I would imagine that there will always be a major author, and then authors who are assisting. In this scenario the main author would be stored as we do now, and the assisting authors would be stored in post info records.
Just a thought. On Sep 10, 2008, at 6:30 AM, Arthus Erea wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2008, at 6:57 AM, Chris Meller wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:00 AM, drzax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Good idea, but how do you capture the data? Is it simply anyone who's >> ever edited the post becomes an author? I suspect that wouldn't be >> suitable. If I was editor of a multi-author blog, chances are I'd be >> making edits to submitted articles, but I wouldn't want to be counted >> as an author. >> >> Maybe something like Wikimedia's 'this is a minor edit'? 'Add me as >> an author'? *shrug* >> > > Yea, that's what I was thinking. > > For the time being, I think we should just change the data structure > and ignore the interface. (ie, store the relationships in the new > table, but still only keep 1 author per post) > >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
