Sean Coates wrote: >> This is the model that Joomla! uses, although with zip/tar rather >> than PHAR. If it's true that a PHAR file can be at least read and >> extracted without the PECL extension, it might be worth it to go this >> route to help promote the format. > > Again, I vote that we postpone phar adoption until it's viable.
Sure, it should not be a requirement until it's viable, but it's fun to plan and be forward-thinking. > Right now, nearly everyone has tools/skills to create either zip or > tar files. I'd guess that less than 100 people in the world have ever > created a .phar. I think it would be trivial to have the extras repo could build them in addition to the zip files it already creates. Owen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
