I do not know enough of the intricacies of licensing to understand this issue and certainly want to avoid the disputes that arise from this, but I would just like to remind *everyone* that we care a common vision here.
Seriously, this is a dispute over the license of our -extras repository. Please try to keep things in context, and remember our common vision and goal. On Dec 3, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Chris Meller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Michael Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > 2008/12/4 Chris Meller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > There *is* no lack of clarity. I suspect anyone who thinks there > is of being > > totally illiterate. > > Come on, ad hominem attacks don't move the debate forward at all. > > It wasn't meant as an attack. I'm seriously failing to see how, > given all that I've said and all that I've linked and referenced, > there could still be any confusion on the issue. The GPLv3 is > compatible with ASL 2 according to *everyone*. Please, tell me the > piece I'm missing here causing a problem... It was an attack and you know it. Calling someone illiterate is a clear cut ad hominem attack. There clearly are sources which say that GPLv3 is not compatible with ASL 2, which both Owen and Michael provided. Regretfully, Arthus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
