On Apr 6, 3:50 pm, Sean T Evans <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we need to look at the release process as a whole to prevent the > short vote time as well as the giant time between releases. Given the > amount of time since our last release, I don't think that three weeks is > really a ridiculous amount of time for prepping the release. >
I don't think we need to spend too much time thinking about why there was such a long gap between 0.5 and 0.6. Our agreed upon focus for 0.6 was ACL, but it turned out that not many of our developers were interested in actually working on it. There already seems to be a bit wider interest in theming as the focus for 0.7, so maybe we'll get more hands on deck for that. --Blake PS This is simultaneously a blessing and a curse for OSS: we can't force people to work on things they don't want to, but in return we also get better in ways we might not have imagined. For instance, "security audit" was not on our checklist for 0.6, but the addition of Superglobals adds a healthy layer of additional security to the project. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
