On Jun 2, 8:15 am, Owen Winkler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ali B. wrote:
> > I think we'd need to hold on to Plugin for a little Longer. We may get
> > to a point were we need something implemented in plugins only. If we
> > switch now and need that in the future, we'd need to break plugins
> > again. This sure is a possibility.
>
> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 2:23 PM, rick c <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> > Since info() is the only thing left in Plugin at the moment, am I
> > correct in concluding this means that Plugin can go away completely?
> > Which would also mean that all plugins should derive from Pluggable,
> > and also need rewritten?
>
> The Plugin class is used for more than just a container for its methods.
> Being derived from the Plugin class denotes a certain status that is
> used by the rest of the code.
>
> Owen
Ok. I look forward to the schema. It's a change that's been needed for
a while.
Rick
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
