Hey all, My view is that the current svn structure works well (http:// pastebin.com/m7a0f75b2 for further description).
I agree that the requirements stuff is a problem. with respect to this, ithink that we should be following the lead in -core, which is to do work in the (unnamed) trunk, with a version number in code. The equivalent to this, as sean has pointed out, is to have a flag in the xml. I like the idea of <version stable='false'>0.6</version>. In my mind, the stability of it is a property of the (to be released) version. Another pointer for fun (http://drunkenmonkey.org/irc/habari/ 2009-11-19#T06-18-38). Cheers! -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
