I am strongly opposed to adding revisions to core, for the reasons outlined in the ticket.
Furthermore, I think it is a very dangerous direction for us to be going in. Apparently we've somehow decided to abandon our roots as a lean/mean system. This seems to me entirely unwarranted. Sure, Habari isn't incredibly popular, but is that a major problem? I know that many of us enjoy using it and building things on top of it. If we start pandering to the lowest common denominator, that's going to be gone. (I'll also likely be leaving again soon.) This seems like far too important of a decision to be made based solely on a few trolls in -users. On Feb 1, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Michael Bishop <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not see a bunch of hardcore devs issuing pull requests. (This is not > meant as a slight to anyone who is contributing, simply pointing out that I'm > seeing more activity from end users.) Really? Where are all these new users? I count exactly one "user" complaining about Habari's usefulness. The rest of us are still using it, and building functionally on top of it. The fact that not many pull requests are issued is a testament to the fact that Habari's core is lean and mean enough that most things can be done with plugins. -- -- To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "habari-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
