On 15 Oct 2008, at 18:00, Arthus Erea wrote:
> What about using a data url? Data URIs (they aren't URLs, but that's pedantry) for images means either using pct-encoding (e.g., %20) or base64 — both of which are vastly inefficient, and whose bandwidth usage will outweight any gain by caching. Then you have the problem of IE < 8. -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-users -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
