Hmm, is the following a normal ntp behaviour ?

reply from 212.68.213.59: offset -0.005038s delay 0.027410s, next query
32s
adjusting local clock by 0.000108s
adjusting clock frequency by -0.005418 to -0.082192ppm
reply from 81.246.92.139: offset -0.001346s delay 0.019774s, next query
3270173s
reply from 195.160.166.150: offset -0.000413s delay 0.028026s, next
query 3434952s
reply from 212.68.197.145: offset -0.003709s delay 0.036492s, next query
3435106s
reply from 212.68.213.59: offset -0.004762s delay 0.026443s, next query
3232306s

I mean, the next query will come after more than 30 days !!!
Sounds weird...

Some investigation led me to this diff over yours:
--- ntp.c       Mon May 18 01:27:19 2009
+++ ntp.c.new   Mon May 18 01:23:03 2009
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
        if (offset > qsmax || !conf->status.synced || conf->freq.num <
3)
                conf->scale = 1;
        else if (offset < qsmin)
-               conf->scale = qsmax / QSCALE_OFF_MIN;
+               conf->scale = QSCALE_OFF_MAX / QSCALE_OFF_MIN;
        else
                conf->scale = qsmax / offset;
 }

And this gives me this:
reply from 212.68.213.59: offset 0.005195s delay 0.027216s, next query
31s
reply from 212.68.213.6: offset -0.054548s delay 0.025824s, next query
30s
reply from 78.40.96.167: offset -0.004814s delay 0.015933s, next query
33s
reply from 79.99.122.30: offset 0.008552s delay 0.016077s, next query
34s
adjusting local clock by 0.000096s
adjusting clock frequency by 0.000191 to -0.080476ppm
reply from 212.68.213.59: offset 0.004480s delay 0.026042s, next query
1640s
reply from 212.68.213.6: offset -0.055247s delay 0.026884s, next query
1646s
reply from 78.40.96.167: offset -0.004397s delay 0.016252s, next query
1542s
reply from 79.99.122.30: offset 0.008508s delay 0.016477s, next query
1544s
reply from 78.40.96.167: offset -0.005140s delay 0.017769s, next query
1615s
reply from 79.99.122.30: offset 0.008020s delay 0.016260s, next query
1515s
reply from 212.68.213.59: offset 0.005071s delay 0.028289s, next query
1612s
reply from 212.68.213.6: offset -0.061995s delay 0.027676s, next query
1618s

Which I think looks more correct. (;

Reply via email to