Am 22.05.2009 um 01:02 schrieb Mike Belopuhov:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 00:49 +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote:
I strongly disangree with that...
That brings nothing.
this makes it easier to live with openbsd underneath.
actually it was the first thing i did when compiled a new kernel.
I built and installed a new kernel on a 4.4 OpenBSD system and
it worked well. Is there a technical reason why you want to keep
the OpenBSD kernel around? If the AerieBSD kernel gets
incompatible with OpenBSD userland, then an OpenBSD
kernel will probably not run with AerieBSD userland, right?
Wouldn't it be more productive to decide if you like to keep "od"
or not?
Sorry for the harsh words but that (for me) aint changes I'd ack.
Who cares about a ports-system, a anoncvs-server?
Your change is cosmetic from my point of view.
Kind regards,
Sebastian
