Makes great sense to me :)  How long till we can see it work?

-Zack

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Joshua Koenig
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 2:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [hackers] Re: [developers] MetaDean NodeTracking Design Doc


As I see it there are two purposes to having MetaDean "rate" content:

1) To tell what's hot, popular, kickin' etc. (most important)

2) To allow for some kind of editorial comment on content (e.g. "Be 
aware of this awful news article; it's a complete hack job.")

Item #1 is accomplished by having metadean observe how often a given 
piece is showing up around the net, how often something is 
re-syndicated. Perhaps this isn't feasable, but I always thought it 
would be rather simple to keep track of the origin of a piece of 
syndicated content. Then when MetaDean sees that a piece titled 
"Insightful Poll Analysis" originating from user fooboo on node 
desmoins.fordean.net is popping up on 35 sites, this piece will 
presumably get a high rating.

Or, looking at your question again, maybe we have different 
understandings of "bubble up" syndication: MetaDean doesn't really have 
much to do with this. If MetaDean picked up low-lying content and 
pulled it to the top, it wouldn't really be bubbling up. The whole 
notion of the bottom-to-top feed is that it occurs though different 
site admins and blog editors deciding that each other's content is 
worth linking to or re-posting.

Item #2 is encapsulated in the normal blog format. We have to trust 
that we're smart enough and tasteful enough to do our own 
editorializing. If someone just links to a dean-bashing article, pretty 
soon someone will pick it apart in their blog, and then that blog 
content becomes the hot link.

This making sense to y'all?
-j

> Looks great so far Josh, but my one big question is - how does
MetaDean
> assign ratings to content so that it can be bubbled up? Will sites
ping
> the server? Or will it just have feeds for "hot" items? Or is there an
> easier way to do this that my addled brain isn't coming up with right
> now?
>
> -Zack
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Koenig
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Zephyr Teachout
> Subject: [developers] MetaDean NodeTracking Design Doc
>
>
> A first stab at a design doc for node-tracking MetaDean is here:
>
> http://www.hack4dean.org/phpwiki/index.php?NodeTracking
>
> If no one else does it, I'll hammer out a first-draft SQL schema over
> the weekend. The other big question now is where we're going to set up
> our sandbox.
>
> Note that when I talk about MetaDean from now on, I'm talking about
> tracking nodes/sites and content only, not talent. The talent stuff is
> going under the Visible Volunteer social networking tool (aka
> Deanster). Unless there are objections, of course. ;)
>
> cheers
> -josh
>
> ------------------------
> Politics is the art of controlling your environment. Participate!
> Elect Howard Dean President in 2004!
> http://www.outlandishjosh.com/politics/dean/
>
>
>
------------------------
Politics is the art of controlling your environment. Participate!
Elect Howard Dean President in 2004!
http://www.outlandishjosh.com/politics/dean/

Reply via email to