On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:25:09 -0800 Evan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
> The arg loops can simply be for (; *argv; argv++) as the standard > guarantees argv[argc] is NULL. Hey Evan, I discussed this with stateless and we came to the conclusion that the argc-approach is more idiomatic. I personally favor for-loops with guaranteed break-conditions, but you're right about the standard. Cheers FRIGN -- FRIGN <[email protected]>
