2016-05-22 18:00 GMT-03:00 Lucas Vuotto <l.vuott...@gmail.com>: > Hello FRIGN, > > the patch is for ubase, not sbase, which, by definitio, is ugly :D > > Anyway, what you say may still hold true. The patch could be smaller if we > only deal with clear, init and reset parameters, as stated by POSIX. This > come by my mind, but after asking in #suckless, just got an answer from ??, > telling my to go full ncurses tput (which reminds me, it > ?? is Christoph Lohmann
> only deals with string capabilities now -- will fix if it gets merged). > > As for the line count, I don't think it's possibly to make any library > dealing with terminfo smaller by a significant amount (say, 10% less > lines). Take in account that the library must provide a parser for a > context-free grammar. > > Aside, maybe tput is too much for ubase. It's listed in the TODO, but I > don't know if it's really needed. > > Concluding, I sent the patch so you can judge if it's worthless to merge > or no. It wasn't wasted time, because it helped me to find bugs in my > library :D > > Cheers. > > > -- lv. > > > > 2016-05-22 16:08 GMT-03:00 FRIGN <d...@frign.de>: > > On Sun, 22 May 2016 16:01:43 -0300 > > Lucas Gabriel Vuotto <l.vuott...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hey Lucas, > > > >> attached you will find two patches, one implementing a basic library > for dealing > >> with terminfo capabilities and another implementing the tput command > using that > >> library. The library itself is part of a bigger library from me, damned > [0], for > >> TUI creation. > > > >> 9 files changed, 2179 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > :O > > > > definitely too much man. > > > > If we look at sbase, it has the following SLOC-count: > > > > Totals grouped by language (dominant language first): > > ansic: 18805 (97.57%) > > awk: 255 (1.32%) > > sh: 213 (1.11%) > > > > do you really think it's a good idea to increase its size > > by roughly 10% to accomodate one single command? > > > > Cheers > > > > FRIGN > > > > -- > > FRIGN <d...@frign.de> > > > >
