On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 07:54:28PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > Hello fellow hackers, > > don't take it personally, Bert, but I don't think your project sxiv[0] > belongs to the suckless git-repository. > Not only is it licensed with the GPLv2, which is despicable in itself, > but the code doesn't even look suckless to me and there are good ways > to go around the whole image-format-cancer-spread nowadays. > Look at how sent does image handling; it's definitely best to push this > task toward other tools, like farbfeld, for easy internal handling. > > C: 3663 (98.05%) > sh: 43 (1.15%) > awk: 30 (0.80%) > > Do we really need a project the size of dwm to display images? > > The name suckless stands for quality software, which foremost tries to > accomplish elegance and simplicity. There are already too many git > repositories in git.suckless.org, and added to this it seems the sxiv > repo on git.suckless.org is just a github mirror, with all its implied > beauty[1]. Do I really need to dig around github now to see what the > commit fixed? > > What do you think?
hackers@ is not the right place for this kind of discussion.
