On 2016-10-28 13:02, Quentin Rameau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:45:14PM +0000, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
actually, imo, I think
usage() should return success.
Surely not.
The call to usage() is made when wrong options have been passed to the
tool, you wouldn't return “no error” code when there actually has been
an error.
How could a script test if 'foo' is compiled correctly and runs without
any missing shared libraries? if such a thing existed it will return 1>
else, 0 is returned, the program still works fine, you just didn't give
it the right arguments.
---
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
