On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Laslo Hunhold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:19:35 +0000 > Thomas Mannay <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Thomas, > >> From 6665eaa1d2c25a95b44a4f4fb3d24a3bd5c1180f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Thomas Mannay <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:16:32 +0000 >> Subject: [PATCH] Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert > > this patch looks logical to me, but what do the others say? > > Cheers > > Laslo > > -- > Laslo Hunhold <[email protected]> >
POSIX says: "Address 0 shall be valid for this command; it shall be interpreted as if address 1 were specified."
