On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 07:59:00PM +0200, David Demelier wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:34:08PM -0400, Christopher Drelich wrote: > > In terms of bugs in dwm, there seems to be some listed in BUGS and > > some in dwm.1, is this desired behavior or would it be better to have > > them all in one place? > > That's true, the problem with the BUGS file is that it's not installed through > the `make install` target. People will mostly just read the dwm manual page > only. > > On the other hand, having BUGS file in the repo is easier to track and fix > bugs > rather than reading the raw dwm.1 file. > > In my opinion I think we should remove the bugs section from dwm.1 manual page > and place a link through the git repository pointing at BUGS file, what do you > think? >
No, documentation should be readable offline. -- Kind regards, Hiltjo
