On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:15:49AM +0000, Michael Buch wrote: > Indeed personally I thought the $(OS) directories in the original > Makefile made for a cleaner way to port. Though before working on a > rewrite/revert some consensus on this would be good. > Thanks, > Michael > > Am Do., 24. Jan. 2019 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Quentin Rameau > <[email protected]>: > > > Hi, > Hi Michael, > > As part of my setup of FreeBSD I ported slstatus. Is the mainline > a place > > to commit such patches given the platform dependence of a tool > like > > slstatus? I guess porting to new platforms can increase the size > of the > > code base significantly if one sticks to the current project > structure. Or > > is a port like this better suited simply as a fork? > The place would be indeed the suckless repo as it already had the > goal > to support multiple OSes. > Maybe then, we could revert to having a source/object file per > target!
Please don't send HTML mail to the list. Thank you -- Kind regards, Hiltjo
