> > yuck > > Remarks like this aren't constructive, please keep them to yourself.
Come on, don't be butthurted. > I already justified why adding .gitignore and rule to regenerate it is > useful. I'm sorry that you don't approve, but not having a .gitignore > was a significant annoyance to me and was making it difficult to do my > job as maintainer. No, you argued your point, that's different, and it did not answer my point about it being just a bloat for some lazy convenience; I'm talking about the redundancy of having both the actual file tracked in the SCM and a script to generate it instead of manually editing it. > When I asked you about your workflow to try to understand your > opposition to .gitignore, you ignored my question and *at the same > time* accused me of ignoring your question, which I had answered > multiple times at that point. This is not about *me* (or my workflow), nor is it about *you* (or your workflow), but that's what you did nevertheless. > I'm tired of arguing with you, so please, just find a way to deal with it. Nice collaborating with you.
