On 2019-07-05, Richard Ipsum <[email protected]> wrote: > Forgot to mention that I just took this from chown pretty much. > I'm not convinced the checks are needed there either, without the checks > you'll just get an error instead of a usage message.
I think they are needed in chown since the user or group could be omitted. Well, actually `owner && *owner` could just be `*owner`, but I think it's better to leave it for consistency with the group check below.
