On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 21:58:26 +0000 José Miguel Sánchez García <soy.jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear José, > The value passed as maxval, SIZE_MAX, doesn't fit on a long long int > due to signedness. It was causing legitimate range request to be > discarded as bad. > > I tested it serving an mp4 and opening it with Firefox. A "range=0-" > was requested, and it triggered the bug. this is a great catch, thanks! But wouldn't it be better to use MIN(SIZE_MAX, LLONG_MAX)? I haven't found anything in the standard that puts "long long" and "size_t" into any relation, which means, for me, that any case is possible where either value could be larger, but please correct me if I'm wrong. With best regards Laslo
