Hi Hiltjo, thanks for the feedback.
> In general the points look good to me. I haven't looked at the code. > > I think we can ignore some cruft. HTML mail should be avoided, atleast on > suckless. > > Supporting nested threads are a must though (imho). Fair enough. > Right now there are multiple views (by date, thread etc). I'd like to keep > these options. I agree. As long as we can draw the line at 'sort by: attachment', which I still haven't figured out why one might want. > For parsing mail, maybe mblaze or parts of that code can be reused too: > https://github.com/leahneukirchen/mblaze I wasn't aware of mblaze, but from what I can tell it would definitely be a viable option, yes. Btw, I've thought of another plus for a homegrown archiver: In addition to HTML, we could also output Gopher pages. I reckon all it would take is implementing a second set of formatting routines.
