> On Sep 23, 2015, at 13:57, C Crane <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps so. It just surprised me that there wasn't more overall interest. I > thought there would be more people playing with different modes and what not. > I guess I incorrectly assumed most of those with an interest in RF would also > probably be licensed. >
One of the best things about the HackRF is that it puts a nice SDR in the hands of those who want to fiddle with a SDR without having to overcome the barrier of getting licensed. Makes a good gateway drug, though. --Scanner
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
