I can second the recommendation for the NUC although I've got the i7 version because I'm a nerd :-). 16GB of RAM and it easily drives my two Dell 27" 2K monitors. Also very quiet and compact.
--Chuck On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Stewart Allen <allens...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Intel NUC checks all the boxes. For $400 you can get a pretty > powerful Intel i-5 machine in a small case that runs off 19v (laptop > like power adapter) > -- > Stewart > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Ben via HackRF-dev > <hackrf-dev@greatscottgadgets.com> wrote: > > I am trying to select a host computer to attach a HackRF device to. My > > primary requirement is to be able to consistently support the full 20 > MSPS > > sample rate without any issues or flakiness. I'd rather pay a little > extra > > for a device where I won't have issues supporting transfers than cheap > out > > on hardware and waste time resolving transfer issues. > > > > I've searched the mailing list and have not seen a lot of discussion > about > > what devices people are using. > > > > Requirements and desires: > > > > 1) Must-have: Support full 20 MSPS sample rate without any issues or > > flakiness for a single device > > 2) Nice-to-have: Easily runs off of battery > > 3) Nice-to-have: Suitable for operation outdoors (preferably fan-less, > and > > suitable external enclosure options) > > 3) Nice-to-have: Integrated NIC (preferred) or additional USB port to > > support USB-Ethernet adapter (acceptable) > > 4) Nice-to-have: Integrated WiFi (preferred) or additional USB port to > > support USB-WiFi adapter (acceptable) > > 5) Nice-to-have: Support full 20 MSPS sample rate without any issues or > > flakiness for a two devices (Nice-to-have) > > 6) Nice-to-have: Support for some sort of persistent storage (SDCard, > eMMC, > > etc.) > > 7) Obviously the lower cost the better > > > > I know I am probably not going to get all my nice-to-haves. > > > > I've seen the ODROID-XU4 which seems to fit my requirements. Can anybody > > confirm good HackRF transfer results with it? > > > > Are there any other devices where users have had consistently good > results? > > > > Many thanks! > > > > _______________________________________________ > > HackRF-dev mailing list > > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com > > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
