Hey Guys,

You all seemed a little interested in the PRI rankings for the top level
modules. So here is a complete sorted list. The higher the number the
better. There are a few ? (missing) rankings. Some of these modules are
ignored, some of them have no FileMetric data so the system can't tell if
they are no longer existent, some of them have no java files, and some are
just plain missing for some reason.

Anyway.. You'll see that there is an interesting ordering right off the
bat.. hackyStatistics, hackyReport, and hackyKernel grouped together. In my
opinion this seems almost perfect. hackyStatistics is probably our most
stable package, followed by hackyReport, then followed by
hackyKernel.  Also, if it wasn't for Mike's good programming, hackyStdExt
would be right next to that group. The cool thing is that you can almost
see the kernel-lized architecture we have.

In hackyCGQM defense.. it is really brand new code. and it really probably
should be reviewed. So, its ranking seems appropriate.

thanks, aaron

hackyStatistics 933.00
hackyReport 872.25
hackyKernel 870.71
hackyHPCS 865.50
hackyStdExt 827.21
hackyVCS 804.75
hackyReportExample 792.00
hackyDependency 785.25
hackyAnt 781.73
hackyPerf 773.75
hackyTDD 758.25
hackyTelemetry 748.08
hackyVim 688.00
hackyReview 685.18
hackyIssue 602.00
hackyCli 587.60
hackyJBuilder 552.00
hackyEclipse 533.67
hackyJupiter 500.00
hackyCGQM 486.68
hackyVisualStudio ?
hackyTelemetryViewer ?
hackyVIM ?
hackyDocBook ?
hackyCourse ?
hackySQI ?
hackyPrjSize ?
hackyBuild ?
hackyMDS ?
hackyEmacs ?
hackyJPLBuild ?
hackyJira ?
hackyCLI ?
hackyPRI ?
hackyLoadTest ?
hackyEstimate ?
hackyCocomo ?
hackyOffice ?

Reply via email to