(a) windows XP (b) tomcat 5.5.17 (c) both thanks, Aaron
----- Original Message ----- From: Philip Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:44 pm Subject: Re: [HACKYSTAT-DEV-L] hackystat build problems (fwd) To: HACKYSTAT-DEV-L@HAWAII.EDU > OK, now we're getting somewhere! > > For those who are experiencing this problem: > > (a) What platform are you using? > (b) What version of Tomcat are you using? > (c) Do you experience this only with quickStart, freshStart, or both? > > Cheers, > Philip > > --On Tuesday, August 29, 2006 11:42 AM -1000 "(Cedric) Qin ZHANG" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I am not as lucky as Philip, because I am having this error on my > local Windows box. > > > > (1) deploySoap fails over 90% of time in quickStart. But it does > not bother me that > > much. I just call "ant deploySoap" again. > > (2) deploySoap succeeds most of time (perhaps always) in > freshStart.> > > Cheers, > > > > Cedric > > > > > > Philip Johnson wrote: > >> Hi Aaron, > >> > >> I can confirm that I am not getting this error locally, nor are we > >> experiencing it in the daily build. I have the following thoughts: > >> > >> (a) are you intermixing installations of binary distributions with > >> source builds on the same Tomcat? It's possible for Tomcat to > become>> confused in this situation. > >> > >> (b) have you tried re-unzipping Tomcat to get a clean > environment? I > >> am wondering about the state of the work/ directory and so forth. > >> > >> (c) is this occurring on a Windows or non-Windows OS? If it's > >> Windows, then it seems likely it's some sort of irritating local > >> environment configuration problem, since we can't reproduce it > here.>> If it's non-Windows, then please send us more details so we > can try to > >> reproduce it. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Philip > >> > >> --On Sunday, August 27, 2006 8:30 PM -1000 Aaron Kagawa > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> FYI - I gets this error every time I build now. I can't seem to > >>> figure it out. > >>> > >>> thanks, Aaron > >>> > >>> At 08:21 AM 8/25/2006, you wrote: > >>>> From Hongbing: > >>>> > >>>> Yes, I still have this error. On Linux I have to explicitly all > >>>> deploySoap task otherwise the server will not receive data. > >>>> > >>>> I saw a couple of emails on this issue. I have a theory that > might>>>> prevent this error forever. With some investigations and > >>>> review of our build files I found that we might deploy soap > before>>>> Hackystat web application is sucessfully deployed to > >>>> Tomcat, which takes some time because we have a lot stuff in > >>>> hackystat\<WEB-INF>. In Hackystat ANT task > >>>> hackyCore_Build.hotDeployHackystat, we simply do this: > >>>> > >>>> <loadfile property="install.results " > >>>> srcFile="install-results.tmp" /> > >>>> <echo level="info" message="Install results: > ${install.results}"/>>>>> <delete file="install-results.tmp" /> > >>>> <makeEcho message="Completed > >>>> hackyCore_Build.hotDeployHackystat" > >>>> prefix="hackyCore_Build.hotDeployHackystat"/> > >>>> > >>>> The thing is that we may deploy our application sucessfully. The > >>>> missing part is that we do not assure that /hackystat > application is > >>>> listable, which means Tomcat is still loading Hackystat but we > think>>>> it is finished. > >>>> > >>>> My theory is that the exception happens when Tomcat is busy > loading>>>> Hackystat application. To ensure that /hackystat is > correctly>>>> listed, we can add one more get task to query > /hackystat or > >>>> hackystat manager either after task hotDeployHackystat or > before task > >>>> deploySoap. > >>>> > >>>> BTW: fork does not do anything good except that it will start > a new > >>>> JVM instance, which may have a delay for /hackystat getting > >>>> ready for soap deployment. > >>>> > >>>> I am leaving here soon and do not have much time to work on this > >>>> issue. You can play around with ANT to add this check. It is > >>>> a tomcat issue not SOAP issue according to my understanding. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Hongbing > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> At 01:04 AM 8/25/2006, you wrote: > >>>>> Okay.. this problem has reappeared. What's irritating about this > >>>>> error is that it only occurs sometimes, but sometimes in > bunches.>>>>> > >>>>> I'm using the following software versions. >