Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Lucene-hadoop Wiki" for 
change notification.

The following page has been changed by stack:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-hadoop/Hbase/PerformanceEvaluation

The comment on the change is:
New numbers for TRUNK

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ||sequential writes||850||1278||1112||8547||
  ||scans||3063||3692||3758||15385||
  
+ 
+ == HBase TRUNK 12/19/2007, r605675 ==
+ 
+ Below are numbers for version r605675, 12/19/2007.  Looks like writing got a 
bit better -- probably because of recent lock refactoring -- but reading speed 
has almost halved.  I'd have expected the read speeds to also have doubled but 
I'd guess there is still a HADOOP-2434 like issue over in the datanode.  I've 
also added numbers for sequential writes, random and next ('scan') reads into 
and out of a single HDFS mapfile for comparison.  Going by current numbers, 
pure mapfile writes are slower than the numbers google posted in initial 
bigtable paper and reads just a bit faster (except when scanning).  GFS must be 
fast.
+ 
+ ||<rowbgcolor="#ececec">Experiment 
Run||HBase20070708||HBase20070916||0.15.0||20071219||mapfile||!BigTable||
+ ||random reads ||68||272||264||167||1718||1212||
+ ||random reads (mem)||Not implemented||Not implemented||Not implemented||Not 
Implemented||-||10811||
+ ||random writes||847||1460||1277||1400||-||8850||
+ ||sequential reads||301||267||305||138||-||4425||
+ ||sequential writes||850||1278||1112||1691||5761||8547||
+ ||scans||3063||3692||3758||3731||28886||15385||
+ 

Reply via email to