[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-470?page=comments#action_12429811 ] eric baldeschwieler commented on HADOOP-470: --------------------------------------------
Recursive size is going to be expensive, right? Don't think we should do that by default. -1 We could provide a link to do a DU to the UI. > Some improvements in the DFS content browsing UI > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: HADOOP-470 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-470 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: dfs > Reporter: Devaraj Das > Priority: Minor > > Some improvement requests from Yoram: > 1. directory browsing: the size, replication and block size fields are > unused, and indeed the replication field contains random junk. It would be > useful to use these fields to represent the size of the folder (recursive, > like du -s), and possibly the number of files in the folder. > 2. since file sizes are typically very large, introducing a comma thousands > separator will make them more readable. > 3. For a particular file I have the list of blocks that make it up. It would > be useful to see the block placement information - which datanodes are > holding that block. That's arguably more relevant than the block contents > when clicking on the block. > 4. a nit - 2048 may be too small a chunk size by default. The overhead of > getting the first byte is so high (redirect, connect, handshake etc.) that > you may as well get 10-20k as your first shot. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
