[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-95?page=comments#action_12431947 ] Bryan Pendleton commented on HADOOP-95: ---------------------------------------
I think Eric's comment (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-95#action_12371188) is still important. But, probably a new issue to bring up. Ongoing validation/balancing/etc. are still problems - the "fsck" utility just covers the top-level problem. > dfs validation > -------------- > > Key: HADOOP-95 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-95 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: dfs > Affects Versions: 0.1.0 > Reporter: Hairong Kuang > Attachments: AccumulatingReducer.java, IOMapperAdapter.java, > TestDFSIO.java, TestReadFS.java > > > Dfs needs a validation operation similiar to fsck, so that we get to know the > files that are corrupted and which data blocks are missing. > Dfs namenode also needs to log more specific information such as which block > is replication or is deleted. So when something goes wrong, we have a clue > what has happened. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
