[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-574?page=comments#action_12454434 ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] commented on HADOOP-574: ------------------------------------------
+1 on scheme. Regards mixing in of access id and access secret, users will need to be a careful with job input files that list s3 files by URI. On bucket as host, its probably safe to say the s3 hostname, s3.amazonaws.com, isn't likely to change any time soon. And if ever there was to be an s3 filesystem that went over SSL, its scheme might be s3s? > want FileSystem implementation for Amazon S3 > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-574 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-574 > Project: Hadoop > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: fs > Affects Versions: 0.9.0 > Reporter: Doug Cutting > Attachments: dependencies.zip, HADOOP-574-v2.patch, HADOOP-574.patch > > > An S3-based Hadoop FileSystem would make a great addition to Hadoop. > It would facillitate use of Hadoop on Amazon's EC2 computing grid, as > discussed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/hadoop-user@lucene.apache.org/msg00318.html > This is related to HADOOP-571, which would make Hadoop's FileSystem > considerably easier to extend. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
