[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478149
]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-1053:
--------------------------------------
> RecordComparator.compare is defined. It calls Utils.compareBytes.
Yes, but is that implementation ever used? A custom implementation is defined
with every generated class, so it looks to me like the implementation on the
base class is never called. Thus it would be better if that method were
abstract, no? Or have I missed something?
> Make Record I/O functionally modular from the rest of Hadoop
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-1053
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1053
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: record
> Affects Versions: 0.11.2
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Milind Bhandarkar
> Assigned To: Milind Bhandarkar
> Fix For: 0.13.0
>
> Attachments: jute-patch.txt
>
>
> This issue has been created to separate one proposal originally included in
> HADOOP-941, for which no consensus could be reached. For earlier discussion
> about the issue, please see HADOOP-941.
> I will summarize the proposal here. We need to provide a way for some users
> who want to use record I/O framework outside of Hadoop.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
