Progress reporting thread can afford to be slightly lenient towards exceptions 
other than ConnectException
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: HADOOP-1586
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1586
             Project: Hadoop
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: mapred
    Affects Versions: 0.14.0
            Reporter: Devaraj Das
            Assignee: Devaraj Das
             Fix For: 0.14.0


Currently, in the loop of Task.startCommunicationThread, MAX_RETRIES (set to 
three) attempts are made to report progress/ping 
(TaskUmbilicalProtocol.progress or TaskUmbilicalProtocol.ping). All attempt 
failures are counted as critical. Here I am proposing a variant - treat only 
ConnectException exceptions are critical and treat the others as non-critical. 
The other exception could be the SocketTimeoutException in the case of the two 
RPCs. 
The reason why I am proposing this is that since HADOOP-1462 went in, I have 
been seeing quite a few unexpected 65 deaths, and with some logging it appears 
that they happen, most of the time, due to the SocketTimeoutException in the 
progress RPC call (before HADOOP-1462, the return value of progress would not 
be checked). And when the hack described above was put in, things improved 
considerably. 
One argument that one might make against the above proposal is that the 
tasktracker could be faulty, when a task is not able to successfully invoke an 
RPC on it even though it is able to connect. If this is indeed the case, even 
in the current scheme of things, the only resort is to restart the tasktracker 
(either manually, or, the JobTracker asks it to reinitialize), and in both the 
cases, normal behavior of the protocol will ensure that the child task will die 
(since the reinited tasktracker is going to return false for the progress/ping 
calls).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to