BTW, patch for 1121 requires this to be able to handle job recover on
JT failure.

It is using the same date format.

The only difference is that is was doing it only for jobs that are
autorecoverable.

I'll have to remove this from my patch.

Cheers.

A


On 7/10/07, Nigel Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for dates in Owen's suggested format, so that the job id's will be
easily sortable.

On Jul 10, 2007, at 1:11 AM, Enis Soztutar (JIRA) wrote:

>
>     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1473?
> page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
> tabpanel#action_12511351 ]
>
> Enis Soztutar commented on HADOOP-1473:
> ---------------------------------------
>
>> its looks much cleaner and also is easy to grep on the logs with
>> the jobs ran on some day and some month.
> The date in the job's id is not intended to be the date job is run
> but the JT is started.
>
>> +1 for date/times, they're generally easier to remember than
>> random strings.
> you do not have to remember the dates' unless you're dealing with
> jobs' which run on (now) stopped JT.
>
> IMO as far as "look at job 75" is concerned, i think either method
> would make no difference.
>        look at job 75 => find {{job_200706081450_00075}}
> or   look at job 75 => find {{job_jkx3y7_00075}}
>
> my vote is to 4-6 digit hash of the JT start time
>        look at job 75 => find {{job_4390_00075}}
>
> but now it is harder to explain what 4390 is to new comers.
>
>
>> Make jobids unique across jobtracker restarts
>> ---------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: HADOOP-1473
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
>> HADOOP-1473
>>             Project: Hadoop
>>          Issue Type: Improvement
>>          Components: mapred
>>    Affects Versions: 0.12.3
>>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>>            Assignee: Owen O'Malley
>>             Fix For: 0.14.0
>>
>>         Attachments: new-job-id.patch
>>
>>
>> I'll make the job ids unique across JobTracker restarts by adding
>> the startup time of the JobTracker, so if the JobTracker started
>> at 8 Jun 2007 14:50, the first job would be called:
>> job_200706081450_00001
>> the second job would be:
>> job_200706081450_00002
>> and so on...
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>


Reply via email to