[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522019
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-1766:
-----------------------------------
+1
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12364374/blockInfo.patch
applied and successfully tested against trunk revision r568809.
Test results:
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/601/testReport/
Console output:
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/601/console
> Merging Block and BlockInfo classes on name-node.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-1766
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1766
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.14.0
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Assignee: Konstantin Shvachko
> Fix For: 0.15.0
>
> Attachments: blockInfo.patch
>
>
> In current implementation
> - BlocksMap references BlockInfo
> - INode references Block
> - BlockInfo contains a reference to the corresponding Block
> It would be better to incorporate Block into BlockInfo and reference the
> latter everywhere in name-node structures.
> This saves 24 bytes per block on a 64-bit jvm as stated in HADOOP-1687 (5).
> I retained the Block class as a structure for external (client and data-node)
> communication.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
