[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527600
]
Raghu Angadi commented on HADOOP-1762:
--------------------------------------
+1 I think. Contrib failure is expected (HADOOP-1888).
> Namenode does not need to store storageID and datanodeID persistently
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-1762
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1762
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.14.0
> Reporter: Raghu Angadi
> Assignee: Raghu Angadi
> Attachments: HADOOP-1762-Opt2.patch, HADOOP-1762-Opt2.patch,
> HADOOP-1762-Opt2.patch, HADOOP-1762-Opt2.patch, HADOOP-1762-Opt2.patch,
> HADOOP-1762-Opt2.patch, HADOOP-1762.patch, HADOOP-1762.patch
>
>
> Currently Namenode stores all the storage-ids it generates since the
> beginning (since last format). It allocates a new storageID everytime a new
> datanode comes online. It also stores all the known datanode ids since the
> beginning.
> It would be better if Namenode did not have to keep track of these. I will
> describe a proposal in the next comment.
> This has implecations regd how Namenode helps administrators identify 'dead
> datanodes' etc. These issues are addressed in HADOOP-1138.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
