[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12533830
 ] 

dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-1942:
------------------------------------------

My analysis of the logs show that each sync is taking about 10 ms on the 
average. Also, when a sync is running, an average of 25-30 threads are waiting 
for that sync (or the next sync) to complete.

Given the above, I think the next experiment we can run is to do th same 
benchmark with the number of threads on the namenode set to 100 or so. 

> Increase the concurrency of transaction logging to edits log
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1942
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1942
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: dfs
>            Reporter: dhruba borthakur
>            Assignee: dhruba borthakur
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.15.0
>
>         Attachments: transactionLogSync.patch, transactionLogSync2.patch, 
> transactionLogSync3.patch, transactionLogSync4.patch, 
> transactionLogSync5.patch, transactionLogSync6.patch, 
> transactionLogSync8.patch, transactionLogSync9.patch
>
>
> For some typical workloads, the throughput of the namenode is bottlenecked by 
> the rate of transactions that are being logged into tghe edits log. In the 
> current code, a batching scheme implies that all transactions do not have to 
> incur a sync of the edits log to disk. However, the existing batch-ing scheme 
> can be improved.
> One option is to keep two buffers associated with edits file. Threads write 
> to the primary buffer while holding the FSNamesystem lock. Then the thread 
> release the FSNamesystem lock, acquires a new lock called the syncLock, swaps 
> buffers, and flushes the old buffer to the persistent store. Since the 
> buffers are swapped, new transactions continue to get logged into the new 
> buffer. (Of course, the new transactions cannot complete before this new 
> buffer is sync-ed).
> This approach does a better job of batching syncs to disk, thus improving 
> performance.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to