[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540480
 ] 

Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-2160:
--------------------------------------

After we do this, the Hadoop subversion tree should look something like:
{noformat}
hadoop/
  branches/
  tags/
  trunk/
    docs/    -- generated html of user documentation
    src/
      docs/  -- source files of user documentation
  site/
    author/  -- source files of website
    publish/ -- generated html of website
{noformat}
Then our published website directory 
(people.apache.org:/www/lucene.apache.org/) would have the following things 
checked out from subversion to create the production site:
{noformat}
  hadoop/ -- http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/hadoop/site/publish
    0.15.0/ -- 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/hadoop/tags/release-0.15.0/docs
    0.14.3/ -- 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/hadoop/tags/release-0.14.3/docs
{noformat}
The site pages would link to the version-specific user documentation through 
relative links that assume this deployment structure.

Does this sound reasonable?


> separate website from user documentation
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-2160
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2160
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Doug Cutting
>
> Currently the website only contains the documentation for a single release, 
> the current release.  It would be better if the website also contained 
> documentation for past releases, since not everyone is using the current 
> release.  To implement this we should move the top-level of the website, 
> including project and developer information, from the subversion trunk into a 
> separate tree, so that only the user documentation is branched per release.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to