Check here for a Cryptogram article about Palladium:
http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0208.html#1
It says:
<<<
Microsoft readily acknowledges that Pd will not be secure against hardware
attacks. They spend some effort making the secure processor annoying to
pry secrets out of, but not a whole lot of effort. They assume that the
tamper-resistance will be defeated. It is their intention to design the
system so that hardware attacks do not result in class breaks: that
breaking one machine doesn't help you break any others.
>>>
A few people thought the opposite was the fact in one of our previous
meetings.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/
An apple a day will keep a doctor away. Two apples a day will keep two
doctors away.
Falk Fish
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Haifa Linux Club Mailing List (http://www.haifux.org)
To unsub send an empty message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
