On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:37:48PM +0200, Mark Silberstein wrote: > Hi all, > can anyone explain, why statically linked binaries from glibc2.2 systems > segfault on glibc2.3 systems? If the link is static, doesn't it mean > that binary compatibility between the systems is sufficient to run the > executable?
Occam's razor leads me to ask whether you are sure the segfaults are related to the glibc version... -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ "the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
