Ok I thought from what you wrote: > Thing is, there is no real reason to be root. No actual root privileges are required that Debian requires a root without an actual need for that.
This is where I think the flaw is - in erroneously requiring to be a root. Gabi -----Original Message----- From: Shachar Shemesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 8:16 PM To: gabik Cc: 'Haifa Linux Club' Subject: Re: [Haifux] Announcing a new project - fakeroot-ng gabik wrote: > Hi > > > Would not it be more correct to fix the system, that requires you to > be root if this is not really required, to not require a root? > I described the system. I'll gladly hear your suggested solution. I'll even settle for you saying where the logic flaw is that causes root to be erroneously required. > I mean - this is the where the "real bug" is. > Again, elaborate on "this", and we can have a discussion. As far as I can see, we have a very reasonable set of requirements, each of them totally reasonable, and they lead to the conclusion that either root or a way to treat non-root as root is required. Show me the flaw in the logic, and we can discuss "better" alternatives. Shachar _______________________________________________ Haifux mailing list Haifux@haifux.org http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux
