On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 03:15:18PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote: > 2008/5/14 Eli Billauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > What really beats me, is why the original bug (consuming uninitialized > > data) wasn't fixed in the main branch in the first place (which, I > > understand, happened at a later stage) rather than in a local patch. > > > > Debian does not often push patches upstream. This was widely discussed > in the relevant /. article. It's a great read: > http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/13/1533212 (as posted > earlier in the thread)
And you actually believe everything they write on Slashdot? (That is to say: no decent references over there) -- Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | best ICQ# 16849754 | | friend _______________________________________________ Haifux mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux
