On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 02:23:46PM +0200, Ohad Lutzky wrote: > What do you guys think about this issue? I want to say that it's pressing, > but: > > 1. This is the only remaining problematic protocol for me. SSH works > perfectly, and git works just as well over HTTP nowadays, if I'm not > mistaken. > 2. It seems unnecessary, in my opinion, for this protocol to exist - it > should just be done over HTTP.
Surely not. A different protocol makes it easy for the provider to treat this protocol differently. > > However, network neutrality is always important, and Bezeq International's > claims of "we don't block any ports" become problematic (albeit technically > true). Is there anything that can be done about this? At work (at the time: using a Barak business ADSL account) had to mess with the support personnel for a few days to make the git protocol work properly. Don't expect them to actually admit it. Expect those "network oddities" to "resolve themselves". -- Tzafrir Cohen | [email protected] | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's [email protected] | | best [email protected] | | friend _______________________________________________ Haifux mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haifux
